Skills directory

Add line-specific review comments to pull requests using GitHub CLI API

Use when writing, reviewing, or committing code to enforce Karpathy's 4 coding principles — surface assumptions before coding, keep it simple, make surgical changes, define verifiable goals. Triggers on "review my diff", "check complexity",

Review a PR or branch diff using the knowledge graph for full structural context. Outputs a structured review with blast-radius analysis.

Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin Flow state and event APIs with StateFlow, MutableStateFlow.update, SharedFlow, Channel, stateIn, SharingStarted, .value, receiveAsFlow, one-shot events, or sentinel initial values.

收到代码审查反馈后、实施建议之前使用，尤其当反馈不明确或技术上有疑问时——需要技术严谨性和验证，而非敷衍附和或盲目执行

Use when writing or reviewing Kotlin code that stores CoroutineScope, launches from init/non-suspending APIs, calls runBlocking, or catches broad exceptions around suspend calls.

Review an existing GitHub pull request and post inline review comments on its diff. Use when the changes are on an opened PR rather than your local working tree.

Review only changes since last commit using impact analysis. Token-efficient delta review with automatic blast-radius detection.

Run vet immediately after ANY logical unit of code changes. Do not batch your changes, do not wait to be asked to run vet, make sure you are proactive.

ESP32 firmware engineering for ESP-IDF projects. Write, review, and debug embedded C/C++ code involving FreeRTOS tasks/queues/timers, GPIO/I2C/SPI/UART/ADC/PWM peripherals, TWAI/CAN, Wi-Fi/BLE networking, OTA updates, Secure Boot and flash

Performs comprehensive Rust security review for safe/unsafe boundary issues, memory safety in unsafe blocks, concurrency hazards, panic-induced DoS, FFI safety, and async runtime mistakes. Use when auditing Rust crates, services, or librari

Agent skill for swarm-pr - invoke with $agent-swarm-pr

Review your local uncommitted working-tree changes (git diff plus untracked files) and return actionable improvement suggestions. Use before committing, when nothing has been pushed yet.

Agent skill for reviewer - invoke with $agent-reviewer

Agent skill for code-review-swarm - invoke with $agent-code-review-swarm

GitHub workflow automation, PR management, issue tracking, and code review coordination. Integrates with GitHub Actions and repository management. Use when: PR creation, code review, issue management, release automation, workflow setup. Ski

Agent skill for code-analyzer - invoke with $agent-code-analyzer

React 19 performance patterns and composition architecture for Vite + Cloudflare projects. 50+ rules ranked by impact — eliminating waterfalls, bundle optimisation, re-render prevention, composition over boolean props, server/client boundar

Comprehensive code review for diffs. Analyzes changed code for security vulnerabilities, anti-patterns, and quality issues. Auto-detects domain (frontend/backend) from file paths.

Build a persistent knowledge graph of your codebase so Claude reads only what matters — up to 49x fewer tokens on coding tasks.

Adversarial code review using cross-model approach. Spawns reviewers on the opposing model (Claude uses Codex, Codex uses Claude) to challenge work from distinct critical lenses. Produces a synthesized verdict with findings and lead judgmen

Agent skill for analyze-code-quality - invoke with $agent-analyze-code-quality

Comprehensive GitHub code review with AI-powered swarm coordination

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-t

Trigger a pre-merge release readiness review on a GitHub PR, GitLab MR, or local branch. Use when the user wants to analyze code changes for risk, correctness, and potential rollback issues before merging. Trigger words include release read

Mandatory code reviews via /code-review before commits and deploys

Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

Read open comments from the tree browser and resolve them by making code fixes

Review or re-review a PR by number in an isolated worktree. Runs the `om-code-review` skill — or, for spec-only design PRs, a specification review — submits approve/request-changes, manages pipeline labels. On changes-requested, the autofix

Comprehensive macOS development guidance including Swift 6+, SwiftUI, SwiftData, architecture patterns, AppKit bridging, and macOS 26 Tahoe APIs. Use for macOS code review, best practices, UI review, or platform-specific features.

Interacts with live Hunk diff review sessions via CLI. Inspects review focus, navigates files, hunks, and exact lines, reloads session contents, adds inline review comments, and paints attention marks on character ranges. Use when the user

Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.

Audits production source code files based on the strategy in workspace/plan.json. Use when a review plan exists and you need to perform static analysis and deep-dive reviews of targeted files. Don't use for planning, deduplicating, or writi

Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for

Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.

Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover

Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET. USE FOR: vectorizing scalar loops with TensorPrimitives, Vector64/128/256/512, or platform hardware intrinsics; reviewing existing SIMD code, including the generic Vector type, for

Generates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC

Reviews a Unity 6 URP ScriptableRendererFeature that uses the Render Graph API, checking resource wiring, material binding, execution structure, and best practices. Use to validate a renderer feature.

SOLID principles, design patterns, DRY, KISS, and clean code fundamentals. Use when reviewing architecture, checking code quality, refactoring, or discussing design decisions. Triggers on "review architecture", "check code quality", "SOLID

Safely track pull request feedback, resolve review comments or merge conflicts, validate fixes, and use a read-only cross-review before committing or pushing follow-up changes.

GitHub PR の CI ステータス (`gh pr checks`)・コード品質・セキュリティ (OWASP Top 10)・Conventional Commits 準拠をレビューする。`gh pr review --approve/--request-changes/--comment` でレビュー投稿も可能。「PR #N をレビュー」「PR レビューして」などで使用。ローカル diff のレビューには implement-review を使用。

コード変更 (`git diff`) の品質・アーキテクチャ準拠・セキュリティ (OWASP Top 10) を Agent ツール委譲で読み取り専用レビューする。コミット前/PR 作成前のセルフレビュー、「変更をレビューして」「コードレビューして」などで使用。GitHub PR のレビューには implement-review-pr を使用。

Review a diff, branch, or PR against correctness, security, breaking-change, and quality standards — runs the validation gate, applies the built-in checklist plus any repo-local one, and produces severity-ranked findings with an approve/req

Comprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-

Team of specialist AI workflows for Claude Code with CEO review, engineering planning, code review, shipping, QA testing, and browser automation

Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council

PRの変更内容をトリアージし、変更カテゴリ分類・表層チェック・必要リファレンス判定を行います。結果を`.pr-triage.json`に出力し、後続のコードレビューフェーズで活用します。CI環境でのコスト最適化に使用してください。

Read open review comments and resolve them by making code fixes

Review current diff and leave comments using diffity agent commands