Skills directory

Use this skill to review a Lightning Web Component (.html, .js, .css files) for right-to-left (RTL) internationalization correctness, producing a finding list with code-level fixes covering CSS logical properties, bidirectional text handlin

Review TypeScript and JavaScript code changes for compliance with Metabase coding standards, style violations, and code quality issues. Use when reviewing pull requests or diffs containing TypeScript/JavaScript code.

PRやコード変更の汎用コードレビューを実施します。コードの品質、セキュリティ、設計を共通基準で評価し、approve/rejectを判断します。「このPRをレビュー」「コードレビューして」「マージ前チェック」などの依頼や、gh pr viewコマンドの実行時に使用してください。

Fetch and summarize review comments from the active pull request

Applies and explains code conventions across TypeScript, React, C#, and Markdown. Enforces naming rules, file naming patterns, TSDoc and XML doc standards, inline comment intent (the *why*, not the *what*), code structure, error handling, a

Ask the user for a code review by opening the changes in difit, a local diff viewer. Explicit opt-in only — use when the user names difit, asks to open or show the diff in the viewer, or has a standing instruction to request reviews through

Use only when the user explicitly requests a review or audit of backend code under `api/`. Supports pending-change, file-focused, and pasted-diff reviews. Do not use for implementation-only requests, diagnosis without review intent, fronten

Django performance code review. Use when asked to "review Django performance", "find N+1 queries", "optimize Django", "check queryset performance", "database performance", "Django ORM issues", or audit Django code for performance problems.

Swift iOS architecture guidance and playbooks for MVVM, MVI, TCA, Clean Architecture, VIPER, MVP, Coordinator, and Reactive patterns. Use when designing, implementing, refactoring, or reviewing the architecture of a SwiftUI or UIKit feature

Audit animation code against Disney's 12 principles adapted for web. Use when reviewing motion, implementing animations, or checking animation quality. Outputs file:line findings.

MUST be used whenever reviewing a Flows app for code quality, maintainability, or clean code issues — before a PR review, after a feature is complete, or when the user asks for a code review. Do NOT skip linting steps. Triggers: code qualit

Apply this skill whenever writing, reviewing, or refactoring Laravel PHP code. This includes creating or modifying controllers, models, migrations, form requests, policies, jobs, scheduled commands, service classes, and Eloquent queries. Tr

SQLAlchemy ORM and Alembic migration best practices for building safe, performant database schemas. This skill should be used when writing, reviewing, or refactoring SQLAlchemy models, Alembic migrations, or database query patterns. Trigger

Swift Concurrency review and remediation for Swift 6.2+. Use when asked to review Swift Concurrency usage, improve concurrency compliance, or fix Swift concurrency compiler errors in a feature or file. Concrete actions include adding Sendab

Use when reviewing or implementing Lightning Data Service best practices in an LWC (.js, .html, .js-meta.xml) — UIAPI vs Apex, refreshApex / notifyRecordUpdateAvailable, @salesforce/schema imports, LDS record-form data patterns. TRIGGER on

Review RTK Rust code for idiomatic simplification. Detects over-engineering, unnecessary allocations, verbose patterns. Applies Rust idioms without changing behavior.

Use after generating code, after accepting AI suggestions, or when reviewing AI-written modules. Also use when code works but feels brittle, when error handling seems thin, when orphaned resources or missing cleanup are suspected, or when t

Review all currently unreviewed open pull requests, newest first, using the om-auto-review-pr skill and respecting in-progress claim locks.

Review a GitHub pull request using Alan's GitHub MCP tools

Write and review unit tests for Vue 3 + TypeScript + Vitest + Pinia codebases. Use when creating or updating tests for components, composables, and stores; mocking Pinia with createTestingPinia; applying Vue Test Utils patterns; and enforci

Review WooCommerce code changes for coding standards compliance. Use when reviewing code locally, performing automated PR reviews, or checking code quality.

Diagnose and fix React codebase health issues. Use when reviewing React code, fixing performance problems, auditing security, or improving code quality.

Django access control and IDOR security review. Use when reviewing Django views, DRF viewsets, ORM queries, or any Python/Django code handling user authorization. Trigger keywords: "IDOR", "access control", "authorization", "Django permissi

Review current diff and leave comments using diffity agent commands

Read open review comments and resolve them by making code fixes

PRの変更内容をトリアージし、変更カテゴリ分類・表層チェック・必要リファレンス判定を行います。結果を`.pr-triage.json`に出力し、後続のコードレビューフェーズで活用します。CI環境でのコスト最適化に使用してください。

Run a complete quality engineering audit on any codebase. Derives behavioral requirements from the code, generates spec-traced functional tests, runs a three-pass code review with regression tests, executes a multi-model spec audit (Council

Team of specialist AI workflows for Claude Code with CEO review, engineering planning, code review, shipping, QA testing, and browser automation

Comprehensive security and correctness audit of a branch's changes. Use for thermo nuclear, thermonuclear, or deep review requests, or branch/PR diff audits focused on bugs, breaking changes, security issues, devex regressions, and feature-

Review a diff, branch, or PR against correctness, security, breaking-change, and quality standards — runs the validation gate, applies the built-in checklist plus any repo-local one, and produces severity-ranked findings with an approve/req

コード変更 (`git diff`) の品質・アーキテクチャ準拠・セキュリティ (OWASP Top 10) を Agent ツール委譲で読み取り専用レビューする。コミット前/PR 作成前のセルフレビュー、「変更をレビューして」「コードレビューして」などで使用。GitHub PR のレビューには implement-review-pr を使用。

GitHub PR の CI ステータス (`gh pr checks`)・コード品質・セキュリティ (OWASP Top 10)・Conventional Commits 準拠をレビューする。`gh pr review --approve/--request-changes/--comment` でレビュー投稿も可能。「PR #N をレビュー」「PR レビューして」などで使用。ローカル diff のレビューには implement-review を使用。

Safely track pull request feedback, resolve review comments or merge conflicts, validate fixes, and use a read-only cross-review before committing or pushing follow-up changes.

SOLID principles, design patterns, DRY, KISS, and clean code fundamentals. Use when reviewing architecture, checking code quality, refactoring, or discussing design decisions. Triggers on "review architecture", "check code quality", "SOLID

Reviews a Unity 6 URP ScriptableRendererFeature that uses the Render Graph API, checking resource wiring, material binding, execution structure, and best practices. Use to validate a renderer feature.

Generates and reviews Salesforce Apex code with 150-point scoring. TRIGGER when: user writes, reviews, or fixes Apex classes, triggers, test classes, batch/queueable/schedulable jobs, or touches .cls/.trigger files. DO NOT TRIGGER when: LWC

Design, implement, optimize, and review SIMD code in .NET. USE FOR: vectorizing scalar loops with TensorPrimitives, Vector64/128/256/512, or platform hardware intrinsics; reviewing existing SIMD code, including the generic Vector type, for

Use when reviewing Go code or checking code against community style standards. Also use proactively before submitting a Go PR or when reviewing any Go code changes, even if the user doesn't explicitly request a style review. Does not cover

Conduct context-driven code reviews focusing on quality, testability, and maintainability. Use when reviewing code, providing feedback, or establishing review practices.

Audits production source code files based on the strategy in workspace/plan.json. Use when a review plan exists and you need to perform static analysis and deep-dive reviews of targeted files. Don't use for planning, deduplicating, or writi

Use when the user asks for a code review by a fleet of specialized reviewer agents, wants multiple independent reviewer perspectives, or asks to run reviewers in single-pass or iterative fix-until-clean mode. Launches focused subagents for

Launch both thermo-nuclear review subagents in parallel, then synthesize their findings. Use for thermos, double thermo review, or combined bug/security and code-quality branch audits.

Interacts with live Hunk diff review sessions via CLI. Inspects review focus, navigates files, hunks, and exact lines, reloads session contents, adds inline review comments, and paints attention marks on character ranges. Use when the user

Comprehensive macOS development guidance including Swift 6+, SwiftUI, SwiftData, architecture patterns, AppKit bridging, and macOS 26 Tahoe APIs. Use for macOS code review, best practices, UI review, or platform-specific features.

Review or re-review a PR by number in an isolated worktree. Runs the `om-code-review` skill — or, for spec-only design PRs, a specification review — submits approve/request-changes, manages pipeline labels. On changes-requested, the autofix

Read open comments from the tree browser and resolve them by making code fixes

Review code changes with several independent reviewers in parallel, then triage and present the findings. Use when the user says "run code review" or "review this code"

Mandatory code reviews via /code-review before commits and deploys

Trigger a pre-merge release readiness review on a GitHub PR, GitLab MR, or local branch. Use when the user wants to analyze code changes for risk, correctness, and potential rollback issues before merging. Trigger words include release read

Iteratively improves a PR (GitHub), MR (GitLab), or shelved changelist (Perforce) until Greptile gives it a 5/5 confidence score with zero unresolved comments. Triggers Greptile review, fixes all actionable comments, pushes/re-shelves, re-t