{ux-writing}
Create user-centered, accessible interface copy (microcopy) for digital products including buttons, labels, error messages, notifications, forms, onboarding, empty states, success messages, and help text. Use when writing or editing any text that appears in apps, websites, or software interfaces, designing conversational flows, establishing voice and tone guidelines, auditing product content for consistency and usability, reviewing UI strings, or improving existing interface copy. Applies UX writing best practices based on four quality standards — purposeful, concise, conversational, and clear. Includes accessibility guidelines, research-backed benchmarks (sentence length, comprehension rates, reading levels), expanded error patterns, tone adaptation frameworks, and comprehensive reference materials.
npx skills add content-designer/ux-writing-skill --skill ux-writingInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
At least one partner scan raised something.
- NO_CODE
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | This agent skill provides a comprehensive framework and set of templates for UX writing, focusing on accessibility and usability. It includes detailed patterns for interface elements and guidance on voice and tone. No malicious code, data exfiltration, or obfuscation was detected. The skill is primarily documentation-based and does not execute arbitrary code. | 2026-05-31 |
| Socket | pass | — | No alerts | 2026-05-31 |
| Snyk | pass | LOW | Risk: LOW · No issues | 2026-05-31 |
| Runlayer | warn | MEDIUM | 8/23 files flagged | 2026-03-05 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
- .github/workflows/auto-rebuild-skill.yml
- .github/workflows/build-skill.yml
- .github/workflows/main.yml
- docs/figma-integration.md
- examples/real-world-improvements.md
- references/accessibility-guidelines.md
- references/content-usability-checklist.md
- references/patterns-detailed.md
- references/voice-chart-template.md
- templates/empty-state-template.md
- templates/error-message-template.md
- templates/onboarding-flow-template.md
- .gitattributes
- .gitignore
- build-skill.sh
- CHANGELOG.md
- CONTRIBUTING.md
- index.html
- LICENSE
- README.md
- VERSIONING.md
This skill contains more than just a SKILL.md file. It likely requires these additional resources.
- Names a paid or metered serviceSKILL.md: Subscription
A mention can be an optional step, an example, or a warning. Open the skill source to check.
No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | warn | ||
| External Dependencies | 1 match | none | none | |
| Packaging | 40/100 | none | ||
| License | not declared | none | ||
| Tool Access | unrestricted | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.