{cargo-context}
Read and write the workspace GTM knowledge base — the git-backed repository of markdown describing ICPs, personas, plays, proof points, objections, competitors, and signals — plus its runtime sandbox and typed knowledge graph. Triggers: "document our ICP", "write up this persona", "what is our positioning", "add a battlecard", "capture this objection", "what do we know about <segment>", "update our context", "what is in the context repo", "who do we sell to". Skip when: discovering who actually buys from you by analyzing won/lost data — that is cargo-gtm (this skill writes the conclusion down, it does not derive it); storing structured records rather than prose — use cargo-storage; attaching documents to an agent for RAG — use cargo-content.
npx skills add getcargohq/cargo-skills --skill cargo-contextInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
Every partner scan came back clean.
- COMMAND_EXECUTION
- DYNAMIC_EXECUTION
- INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | The skill allows the agent to manage a GTM knowledge base through the Cargo CLI and includes a tool for executing arbitrary shell commands within a sandbox. The primary security risk is indirect prompt injection, as the skill is designed to ingest data from untrusted sources like web scraping and sales transcripts, which could be used to influence the agent's behavior or trigger malicious command execution. | 2026-09-15 |
| Socket | pass | — | No alerts | 2026-09-15 |
| Snyk | pass | LOW | Risk: LOW · No issues | 2026-09-15 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
- references/examples/authoring.md
- references/examples/bootstrap-from-domain.md
- references/examples/graph-queries.md
- references/examples/lifecycle.md
- references/conventions.md
- references/response-shapes.md
- references/troubleshooting.md
- skill-metadata.json
This skill contains more than just a SKILL.md file. It likely requires these additional resources.
- Mentions a sign-in or credentialSKILL.md: ai login
A mention can be an optional step, an example, or a warning. Open the skill source to check.
No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | pass | ||
| External Dependencies | 1 match | none | none | |
| Packaging | 40/100 | none | ||
| License | not declared | none | ||
| Tool Access | unrestricted | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.