{gmgn-wallet-score}
Score any wallet address across three angles — profitability (a real track-record score: is this trader actually good?), copy-tradeability (can YOU actually capture what it makes, plus a latency/slippage/gas backtest), and Dev reputation (if it's mostly a token launcher, how trustworthy are its launches) — plus trading-style tags, all computed deterministically from GMGN portfolio data. Use when the user asks about a wallet's profitability ("这个钱包盈利能力怎么样", "钱包战绩怎么样", "is this wallet profitable"), copy-trade worthiness ("is this wallet worth following", "跟单评分", "钱包评分", "值不值得跟单", "if I copy this wallet what's my real return"), or token-launch/Dev reputation ("这个钱包发盘情况怎么样", "是不是发币方钱包", "dev 信誉怎么样", "is this a token-creator wallet"), or gives a wallet address and wants any of these judgments. A one-line recap of the record or next-step advice (复盘, 一句话总结战绩, 下一步怎么打) goes to gmgn-wallet-review.
npx skills add gmgnai/gmgn-skills --skill gmgn-wallet-scoreInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
At least one partner scan failed this skill.
- COMMAND_EXECUTION
- EXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS
- DYNAMIC_EXECUTION
- INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | The skill analyzes crypto wallet profitability and developer reputation using the gmgn-cli tool. It executes system commands to check for IPv6 connectivity and runs a Python script for data processing. All external tools and packages are associated with the skill's author. | 2026-10-15 |
| Socket | pass | — | No alerts | 2026-10-15 |
| Snyk | fail | HIGH | Risk: HIGH · 1 issue | 2026-10-15 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
This skill is contained by a single SKILL.md file.
- Mentions a sign-in or credentialSKILL.md: API Key
A mention can be an optional step, an example, or a warning. Open the skill source to check.
No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.
Pinning
Where the source repository stands, and the pins hosted sets carry for this skill.
Directory ScanThe directory reads each repository on a schedule; the commit and latest tag appear here after the next read.
No hosted set lists this skill yet. Build one and it is pinned at submission.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | fail | ||
| External Dependencies | 1 match | none | none | |
| Packaging | 100/100 | none | ||
| License | not declared | none | ||
| Tool Access | unrestricted | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.