{ctf-crypto}
Provides cryptography attack techniques for CTF challenges. Use when attacking encryption, hashing, signatures, ZKP, PRNG, or mathematical crypto problems involving RSA, AES, ECC, lattices, LWE, CVP, number theory, Coppersmith, Pollard, Wiener, padding oracle, GCM, key derivation, or stream/block cipher weaknesses.
npx skills add ljagiello/ctf-skills --skill ctf-cryptoInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
At least one partner scan raised something.
- EXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS
- COMMAND_EXECUTION
- INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | The skill is a comprehensive knowledge base and toolkit for Capture The Flag (CTF) cryptography challenges. It provides detailed mathematical explanations, attack patterns, and code snippets for a wide range of cryptographic vulnerabilities. The skill facilitates the installation of standard security tools and libraries from well-known public repositories like GitHub and PyPI. While it contains no malicious code, it possesses a large attack surface for processing untrusted challenge data, which is typical for a security-oriented toolkit. | 2026-09-14 |
| Socket | warn | — | 1 alert: gptAnomaly | 2026-09-14 |
| Snyk | pass | LOW | Risk: LOW · No issues | 2026-09-14 |
| Runlayer | warn | MEDIUM | 7/9 files flagged | 2026-03-15 |
| ZeroLeaks | pass | LOW | 1 finding · Score: 86/100 | 2026-04-16 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
- advanced-math.md
- classic-ciphers.md
- dh-attacks.md
- ecc-attacks.md
- exotic-crypto-2.md
- exotic-crypto.md
- historical.md
- lattice-and-lwe.md
- modern-ciphers-2.md
- modern-ciphers-3.md
- modern-ciphers-4.md
- modern-ciphers.md
- post-quantum.md
- prng-attacks.md
- prng.md
- rsa-attacks-2.md
- rsa-attacks.md
- stream-ciphers.md
- zkp-and-advanced.md
This skill contains more than just a SKILL.md file. It likely requires these additional resources.
- Mentions a sign-in or credentialSKILL.md: flip auth
A mention can be an optional step, an example, or a warning. Open the skill source to check.
An allowed-tools line limits the agent permissions on some platforms.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | warn | ||
| External Dependencies | 1 match | none | none | |
| Packaging | 40/100 | none | ||
| License | MIT | none | ||
| Tool Access | narrow | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.