{ecommerce-growth-strategy}
E-commerce growth strategy advisor. Diagnoses current business health using unit economics (CAC, LTV, AOV, contribution margin), identifies the highest-impact growth opportunities across 5 levers (traffic, conversion, AOV, retention, expansion), and builds a prioritized 90-day growth roadmap. Uses the Ansoff Matrix adapted for e-commerce to evaluate market penetration, channel expansion, product expansion, and new market entry. Includes multichannel readiness assessment (Amazon, Walmart, TikTok Shop, Etsy, DTC/Shopify/Shopify) and product line expansion analysis. No API key required. Use when: (1) planning next phase of e-commerce growth, (2) deciding whether to expand to new channels or products, (3) diagnosing why growth has stalled, (4) prioritizing what to fix or build next.
npx skills add nexscope-ai/ecommerce-skills --skill ecommerce-growth-strategyInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
Every partner scan came back clean.
- INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
- EXTERNAL_DOWNLOADS
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | The skill functions as a strategic advisor for e-commerce growth, using standard frameworks like unit economics and the Ansoff Matrix. It identifies growth bottlenecks and provides prioritized roadmaps. The skill references and provides installation instructions for related tools within the same developer's repository. A minor security concern is identified regarding the collection of user-provided competitor URLs, which serves as a potential surface for indirect prompt injection if the agent accesses these sites. | 2026-09-15 |
| Socket | pass | — | No alerts | 2026-09-15 |
| Snyk | pass | LOW | Risk: LOW · No issues | 2026-09-15 |
| ZeroLeaks | pass | NONE | Score: 93/100 · 2 sections analyzed | 2026-04-16 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
This skill is contained by a single SKILL.md file.
- Mentions a sign-in or credentialSKILL.md: API key
- Names a paid or metered serviceSKILL.md: subscription
A mention can be an optional step, an example, or a warning. Open the skill source to check.
No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | pass | ||
| External Dependencies | 2 matches | none | none | |
| Packaging | 100/100 | none | ||
| License | not declared | none | ||
| Tool Access | unrestricted | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.