{dev-event-kickoff}
Before answering any event-organizing request that opens a new project or a new session, run this router first - it maps the task onto the 71-skill samber/dev-event-organizer-skills collection, or says plainly that none fits, and bootstraps or resumes the project's shared context so the next session starts warm. This fires on a conversational state, not on a subject - invoke it at every event project start even when the collection's skills are already in daily use on another event, at every recurring check-in on the same project, and whenever routing between siblings is unclear. Covers conference, meetup and hackathon kickoffs, "which event skill do I need", "where do I start organizing this event", event organizer skill routing, and recurring event check-ins. Use this whenever someone describes an event-organizing problem without naming a skill, even if they never say "kickoff", "routing" or "start".
npx skills add samber/dev-event-organizer-skills --skill dev-event-kickoffInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
Every partner scan came back clean.
- DATA_EXFILTRATION
- INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
- PERSISTENCE
- TIME_DELAYED_CONDITIONAL
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | The skill acts as an intelligent router for an event management toolkit. It performs automated environment detection by scanning local files and git logs, which introduces a surface for indirect prompt injection and involves accessing potentially sensitive business documents. It also utilizes scheduled routines and repository-based memory for persistence. | 2026-09-28 |
| Socket | pass | — | No alerts | 2026-09-28 |
| Snyk | pass | LOW | Risk: LOW · No issues | 2026-09-28 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
- evals/evals.json
- references/context-artifact.md
- references/format-and-lifecycle-gates.md
- references/routines.md
- references/skill-routing.md
This skill contains more than just a SKILL.md file. It likely requires these additional resources.
Nothing beyond the skill's own files was detected.
No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | pass | ||
| External Dependencies | none found | none | none | |
| Packaging | 55/100 | none | ||
| License | MIT | none | ||
| Tool Access | unrestricted | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.