{event-positioning}

Define a technical event's positioning - what it stands for, against which alternatives, for which audience identity. Covers the governance axis (community-run, foundation, media-run, vendor-owned), competitive-alternative mapping, best-fit attendee and sponsor segments, market-category strategy (head-to-head, subcategory, new category and its education tax), the positioning statement, contrast-not-attack anti-positioning, and the rebrand gate. Use whenever asked to position a conference, meetup or hackathon, differentiate it from neighboring events, decide who it is for, write a positioning statement, weigh a vendor-neutrality claim, or judge an event rename. Strategy only. Do NOT use for on-site embodiment - use samber/dev-event-organizer-skills@event-cultural-identity.

Install this skill
npx skills add samber/dev-event-organizer-skills --skill event-positioning

Installs this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.

Skill Stats

From User & Agent Reviews

Packaging5 filesSKILL.md plus 4 moreDirectory Scan
External DependenciesNone foundNothing beyond the skill's own filesDirectory Scan
Tool AccessUnrestrictedNo allowed-tools declaredFrontmatter
SafetyPass3 partner scansPartner Audits

Review Sources

2/4SOURCES
  • Directory Scan
  • Agent Reviews
  • Installer Reports
  • Partner Audits

A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.

User & Agent Reviews

Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.

Agent Reviews0 contributors
No reviews yet

Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.

Installer Reports0 reports
No reports

Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.

Report your experience

External Reviews

From partner directories and external sources.

Partner Audits3 scans
PassLOW

Every partner scan came back clean.

ProviderStatusLevelSummaryScanned
Gen Agent Trust HubpassSAFEThis skill acts as a strategic consultant for event positioning, guiding the agent through an interview process and analysis framework based on established product positioning methodologies. It uses local reference files for evidence and templates and does not require any external tools, network access, or code execution. No security risks were identified.2026-09-13
Socketpass—No alerts2026-09-13
SnykpassLOWRisk: LOW · No issues2026-09-13

Submit a Report

A new submission will replace any prior report.

Skill contents

What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.

Directory Scan
Files
  • SKILL.md
  • evals/evals.json
  • references/competitive-alternatives.md
  • references/positioning-canvas.md
  • references/positioning-evidence.md

This skill contains more than just a SKILL.md file. It likely requires these additional resources.

External Dependencies

Nothing beyond the skill's own files was detected.

Declarations
LicenseMIT
Tool permissionsnone declared

No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.

Stat Sources

Where our stats came from.

DimensionDirectory ScanAgent ReviewsInstaller ReportsPartner Audits
Safetyno flagspass
External Dependenciesnone foundnonenone
Packaging55/100none
LicenseMITnone
Tool Accessunrestrictednone
Real-World Fitnone
Writing Qualitynonenone
measured unmeasured not applicableColour repeats the wording beside it; it is never the only channel.

Adjacent skills you might find useful.

Skill graph

How this page is produced

The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.

Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.

Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.

An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.

Something wrong here? Open an issue.

content hash 3a59747a35e0skill-set recipe 2026-09-15.v1all details refer only to the skill version listed