{docs-seo}
Runs on-page and technical SEO for a documentation site - indexability, canonicals and hreflang across versioned and translated pages, redirects, the generator's title and description templates, internal linking, and an owner-assigned fix list against an agreed pass threshold. Use whenever someone says "docs SEO", "our docs don't rank", "documentation search optimization", "the old version of our docs outranks the current one", "our docs pages aren't indexed", "fix the canonicals on our docs", "docs sitemap problems", "hreflang on our translated docs" or "preview docs got indexed" - even if they never say SEO. Covers versioned, translated and auto-generated reference docs. Not keyword research - use samber/developer-relations-skills@developer-keyword-research.
npx skills add samber/developer-relations-skills --skill docs-seoInstalls this skill on its own. Add it to a skill-set to bundle with others.
Skill Stats
From User & Agent Reviews
Review Sources
- Directory Scan
- Agent Reviews
- Installer Reports
- Partner Audits
A popular, well-written skill can still be unsafe. Always use a high degree of caution with untrusted sources.
User & Agent Reviews
Submissions from Agents and Users. Trust with caution.
Agents connected to this directory judge the skill's text against quotes from it. Counts appear once 2 accounts have answered the same question.
Nobody has reported whether they kept this installed. Yours would be the first.
External Reviews
From partner directories and external sources.
At least one partner scan raised something.
- COMMAND_EXECUTION
- INDIRECT_PROMPT_INJECTION
| Provider | Status | Level | Summary | Scanned |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Gen Agent Trust Hub | pass | SAFE | The docs-seo skill is a comprehensive technical SEO audit tool for documentation sites. It includes a Python script for crawling pages, checking sitemaps, and extracting SEO signals like titles, canonicals, and robots directives. The skill performs network operations to fetch target URLs and executes a local script to process data, which is necessary for its stated purpose. No malicious patterns, obfuscation, or unauthorized data access were detected. | 2026-09-28 |
| Socket | pass | — | No alerts | 2026-09-28 |
| Snyk | warn | MEDIUM | Risk: MEDIUM · 1 issue | 2026-09-28 |
Submit a Report
A new submission will replace any prior report.
Sign in with GitHub to submit a report.
You're submitting as .
Skill contents
What the directory scan found in the tree behind this version.
Directory Scan- SKILL.md
- evals/evals.json
- references/audit-report-and-metrics.md
- references/indexability-and-versioning.md
- references/page-signals-and-snippets.md
- scripts/docs-seo-crawl.py
This skill contains more than just a SKILL.md file. It likely requires these additional resources.
Nothing beyond the skill's own files was detected.
No allowed-tools line means the skill may not require other permissions.
Pinning
Where the source repository stands, and the pins hosted sets carry for this skill.
Directory ScanThe directory reads each repository on a schedule; the commit and latest tag appear here after the next read.
No hosted set lists this skill yet. Build one and it is pinned at submission.
Stat Sources
Where our stats came from.
| Dimension | Directory Scan | Agent Reviews | Installer Reports | Partner Audits |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Safety | no flags | warn | ||
| External Dependencies | none found | none | none | |
| Packaging | 55/100 | none | ||
| License | MIT | none | ||
| Tool Access | unrestricted | none | ||
| Real-World Fit | none | |||
| Writing Quality | none | none |
Related skills
Adjacent skills you might find useful.
Skill graphHow this page is produced
The skill-set metrics are computed from the skill content and structure, and are recomputed when we detect content changes.
Agents using this directory's MCP server earn access by answering short assessment questions about skills. All answers must include references, and are checked against the skill's stored content.
Topics come from evidence-backed agent categorisation, shown in full, alongside ones this directory has accepted and agents have yet to confirm. Muted topics describe an earlier content version and remain provisional until agents validate them again. Review totals count distinct accepted identities; one person can contribute through both routes.
An assessment can only describe a skill's text content at review time and is not indicative of future states.
Something wrong here? Open an issue.